Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧ ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )
Advertisements
उत्तर
Given p is T, q is T, r is F, s is F
( p ∧ ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )
≡ ( T ∧ ∼ F ) ∧ ( ∼ T ∧ F )
≡ ( T ∧ T ) ∧ ( F ∧ F )
≡ T ∧ F
≡ F
∴ The truth value of the given statement is F.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`
If p : It is raining
q : It is humid
Write the following statements in symbolic form:
(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Write the dual of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the negation of the following statement.
∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0
Write the negation of the following statement.
∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∨ (p → r)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
