Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]
Advertisements
उत्तर
| p | q | p ∧ q | ~ (p ∧ q) | q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)] |
| T | T | T | F | T |
| T | F | F | T | T |
| F | T | F | T | T |
| F | F | F | T | T |
All the truth values in the last column are T. Hence, it is a tautology.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”
Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.
By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(p → r) ∧ q
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
If he studies, then he will go to college.
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Write the dual of the following.
(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)
Write the dual of the following
(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)
Write the dual of the following.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
Using truth table verify that:
(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
