Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Evaluate: ∫ x . log x dx
Advertisements
उत्तर
Let ∫ x . log x dx
= ∫ log x . x . dx ...[by LIATE rule]
Integrating by parts
I = `"log x" . int "x" "dx" - int ["d"/"dx" ("log x") int "x" "dx"] "dx"`
`= "log x" . ("x"^2/2) - int 1/"x" . ("x"^2/2) "dx"`
`= "x"^2/2 . "log x" - 1/2 int "x" "dx"`
`= "x"^2/2 . "log x" - 1/2 ("x"^2/2) + "c"`
`= "x"^2/2 . "log x" - "x"^2/4" + c`
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Construct the truth table of the following:
∼ (∼p ∧ ∼q) ∨ q
Determine the truth values of p and q in the following case:
(p ∨ q) is T and (p ∧ q) is T
Express the following statement in symbolic form.
Even though it is cloudy, it is still raining.
Write the truth value of the following statement.
Earth is a planet and Moon is a star.
Write the truth value of the negation of the following statement.
`sqrt5` is an irrational number.
Write the truth value of the negation of the following statement.
London is in England.
If p and q are true and r and s are false, find the truth value of the following compound statement.
~ [(~ p ∨ s) ∧ (~ q ∧ r)]
If p and q are true and r and s are false, find the truth value of the following compound statement.
~ [p ∨ (r ∧ s)] ∧ ~ [(r ∧ ~ s) ∧ q]
If p : He swims
q : Water is warm
Give the verbal statement for the following symbolic statement.
q ∧ ~ p
Negation of “some men are animal” is ______.
Rewrite the following statement without using the connective ‘If ... then’.
If a quadrilateral is rhombus then it is not a square.
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ∼ q → ∼ p is called its
Write the following compound statements symbolically.
Triangle is equilateral or isosceles
Write the negation of the statement “An angle is a right angle if and only if it is of measure 90°”
Which of the following is false?
The statement, 'If I go to school, then I will get knowledge' is equivalent to ______
The negation of the statement: "Getting above 95% marks is a necessary condition for Hema to get admission in good college'' is ______
Which of the following is logically equivalent to `∼(∼p \implies q)`?
Using truth table prove that:
~ (p `leftrightarrow` q) ≡ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (q ∧ ~ p)
