###### Advertisements

###### Advertisements

The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______

###### Advertisements

#### Solution

The contrapositive of p → ~ q is **q → ~ p**

#### APPEARS IN

#### RELATED QUESTIONS

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p

**Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -**

“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”

Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :

(p ∨ q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)

Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`

Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T

Write the dual of the following statements:

Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.

Write converse and inverse of the following statement:

“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.”

If p : It is raining

q : It is humid

Write the following statements in symbolic form:

(a) It is raining or humid.

(b) If it is raining then it is humid.

(c) It is raining but not humid.

**Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.**

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."

**Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement**

5x - 3 < 10

**Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:**

(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)

Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p

**Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.**

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r

Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]

Select and write the correct answer from the given alternative of the following question:

(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________ .

Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)

**Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r**

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r

**Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.**

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]

**Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.**

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)

**Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.**

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)

**Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.**

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)

**Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.**

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)

**Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.**

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)

**Fill in the blanks :**

Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.

**Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.**

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]

**Using the truth table, verify**

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)

**Using the truth table, verify**

~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q

**Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.**

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)

**Write the negation of the following statement.**

All the stars are shining if it is night.

**Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.**

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"

**With proper justification, state the negation of the following.**

(p → q) ∨ (p → r)

**With proper justification, state the negation of the following.**

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~r)

**Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.**

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)

**Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.**

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p

**Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement. **

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.

**Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement. **

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.

**State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.**

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]

**State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.**

2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.

**Write the dual of the following.**

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)

The false statement in the following is ______.

Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.

“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”

**Write the dual of the following**

(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)

**Choose the correct alternative:**

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a

**Choose the correct alternative:**

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its

**Write the dual of the following.**

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country

**Examine whether the statement pattern**

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.

If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively

The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to _______.

Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.

The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.

Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?

**Using truth table verify that:**

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q

**Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:**

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)

The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.

**Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:**

(p→q)∧(p→r)

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:

(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)

The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)

In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

- `bar(PR)`
- `bar(PM)`
- `bar(QM)`

Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.

If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].