The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______ - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements
Fill in the Blanks

The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______

Advertisements

Solution

The contrapositive of p → ~ q is q → ~ p 

  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1.1: Mathematical Logic - Q.3

RELATED QUESTIONS

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p


Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :

(p ∨ q) →  r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T


Write the dual of the following statements:

Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


If   p : It is raining
     q : It is humid

Write the following statements in symbolic form:

(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid. 


Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Select and write the correct answer from the given alternative of the following question:

(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________ .


Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)


Fill in the blanks :

Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]


Using the truth table, verify

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Write the negation of the following statement.

All the stars are shining if it is night.


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∨ (p → r)


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


The false statement in the following is ______.


Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.

“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”


Write the dual of the following

(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)


Choose the correct alternative:

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


Write the dual of the following.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to _______.


Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)


The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.


Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:

(p→q)∧(p→r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:

(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)


The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications



      Forgot password?
Use app×