Principle: a Person is Said to Have Committed Assault When Apprehension is Caused in the Mind of a Person that He is About to Use Physical Force Against His Body. - Legal Reasoning

Advertisement Remove all ads
MCQ

Principle: A person is said to have committed assault when apprehension is caused in the mind of a person that he is about to use physical force against his body.

Facts: 'A' abuses 'B' while he was sitting in a moving train, by aggressively shaking his fists when 'B' was standing on the railway platform at a distance.

Options

  • 'A' has caused fear of assault in the mind of 'B'.

  • 'A' has committed assault against 'B'.

  • A has not committed assault against 'B'.

  • 'A' has caused apprehension of assault in the mind of 'B'.

Advertisement Remove all ads

Solution

A has not committed assault against 'B'.

Explanation:

Mere words do not amount to an assault. Here in the above-noted problem B was standing at a distance.  For the assault, there must be minimum touching body of A. The reasonable conclusion drawn A has not committed assault against B. Hence "A has not committed assault against 'B'" is correct. 

Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Advertisement Remove all ads
Advertisement Remove all ads
Share
Notifications

View all notifications


      Forgot password?
View in app×