CBSE (Science) Class 12CBSE
Share
Notifications

View all notifications
Books Shortlist
Your shortlist is empty

Solution for Examine If Rolle'S Theorem is Applicable to Any One of the Following Functions. (I) F (X) = [X] for X ∈ [5, 9] (Ii) F (X) = [X] for X ∈ [−2, 2] Can You Say Something About the Converse of - CBSE (Science) Class 12 - Mathematics

Login
Create free account


      Forgot password?

Question

Examine if Rolle's theorem is applicable to any one of the following functions.
(i) f (x) = [x] for x ∈ [5, 9]
(ii) f (x) = [x] for x ∈ [−2, 2]
Can you say something about the converse of Rolle's Theorem from these functions?

Solution

By Rolle’s theorem, for a function f : [a , b] →R , if

(a) f is continuous on [a, b],

(b) f is differentiable on (a, b) and

(c) f (a) = f (b),

then there exists some c ∈ (ab) such that f'(c) = 0 .

Therefore, Rolle’s theorem is not applicable to those functions that do not satisfy any of the three conditions of the hypothesis

(i) f(x) = [x] for x ∈ [ 5 , 9 ]

It is evident that the given function f (x) is not continuous at every integral point.

In particular, f(x) is not continuous at x = 5 and x = 9.

Thus, f (x) is not continuous on [5, 9].

Also , f (5) = [5] = 5 and f (9) = [9] = 9

∴ f (5) ≠ f (9)

The differentiability of f on (5, 9) is checked in the following way.

Let n be an integer such that n ∈ (5, 9).

The left hand limit of  f at x = n  is,

`lim_(h ->o)(f (n + h) - f (n)\)/h = lim_(h->o) ([n + h ] - [n])/h) = lim_(h->o)(n- 1- n)/h = lim_(h ->o)(-1)/h =oo`

The right hand limit of f at x = n is,

`lim_(h->o) (f (n +h )- f (n))/h = lim _(h->o)([n +h] - [n])/h = lim_(h->o)(n-n)/h = lim _(h->o) 0 = 0 `

Since the left and the right hand limits of f at x = n are not equal, f is not differentiable at x = n.

Thus, f is not differentiable on (5, 9).

It is observed that f does not satisfy all the conditions of the hypothesis of Rolle’s theorem.

Hence, Rolle’s theorem is not applicable on f (x) for x ∈ [5 , 9] . 

(ii)  f (x) = [x] for x ∈  [-2 , 2]

It is evident that the given function f (x) is not continuous at every integral point.

In particular, f(x) is not continuous at x = −2 and x = 2.

Thus, f (x) is not continuous on [−2, 2].

Also, f (-2) = [-2] = -2 and f (2) = [2] = 2

∴ f (-2) ≠ f (2)

The differentiability of f on (−2, 2) is checked in the following way.

Let n be an integer such that n ∈ (−2, 2).

The left hand limit of f at x = n is .

`lim_(h->o) (f (n + h) -f (n))/ h  = lim_(h->o) ([n +h]- [n])/h = lim_(h->o)(n - 1- n)/h = lim_(h->o) (-1)/ h =oo`

The right hand  limit of f at x = n is ,

`lim_(h->o) (f(n+h) -f (n))/h = lim_(h->o)([n+h] - [n])/h) lim_(h->o)(n-n)/h = lim_(h->o)(-1)/h = oo`

Since the left and the right hand limits of f at x = n are not equal, f is not differentiable at x = n.

Thus, f is not differentiable on (−2, 2).

It is observed that f does not satisfy all the conditions of the hypothesis of Rolle’s theorem.

Hence, Rolle’s theorem is not applicable on f(x)= [x] for x ∈ [ -2 , 2 ].

  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Solution for question: Examine If Rolle'S Theorem is Applicable to Any One of the Following Functions. (I) F (X) = [X] for X ∈ [5, 9] (Ii) F (X) = [X] for X ∈ [−2, 2] Can You Say Something About the Converse of concept: Maximum and Minimum Values of a Function in a Closed Interval. For the courses CBSE (Science), PUC Karnataka Science, CBSE (Arts), CBSE (Commerce)
S
View in app×