In this Question, the Problem Consists of a Set of Rules and Facts. Apply the Specified Rules to the Set of Facts and Answer the Question. Rules A. the Act of Using Threats to Force Another Person - Legal Reasoning


In this Question, the problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the question.

A. The act of using threats to force another person to enter into a contract is called coercion.
B. The act of using influence on another and taking undue advantage of that person is called undue influence.
C. In order to prove coercion, the existence of the use of threat, in any form and manner, is necessary. If coercion is proved, the person who has been so threatened can refuse to abide by the contract.
D. In order to prove undue-influence, there has to be a pre-existing relationship between the parties to a contract. The relationship has to be of such a nature that one is in a position to influence the other. If it is proven that there has been undue influence, the party who has been so influenced need not enforce the contract or perform his obligations under the contract. 

Aadil and Baalu are best friends. Aadil is the son of a multi-millionaire business person, Chulbul who owns Maakhan Pharmaceuticals.  Baalu is the son of a bank employee, Dhanraj. One day, Aadil is abducted from his office by Baalu. Chulbul receives a phone call from Dhanraj telling him that if he does not make Baalu the CEO  of Maakhan Pharmaceuticals, Aadil will be killed. Chulbul reluctantly agrees to make the Baalu the CEO.  
Subsequently, Chulbul and Baalu sign an employment contract. However, as soon as Aadil is released and safely returns home,  Chulbul tells Baalu that he shall not enforce the employment contract. Baalu and Dhanraj are not sure as to what is to be done next.

Baalu will succeed in getting the employment contract enforced if he can show that


  • He is the best friend of Aadil

  • It was his father, and not he, who used coercion against Chulbul

  • Chulbul has promised his father to employ him

  • None of the above



None of the above

Rule A provides that the person who is threatened can refuse to enforce the contract only on the ground that Dhanraj has used coercion against him. The innocence of Baalu is not a ground to enforce it. See Sec. 15 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

Concept: Indian Contract Act (Entrance Exams)
  Is there an error in this question or solution?

      Forgot password?
Use app×