###### Advertisements

###### Advertisements

**Choose the correct alternative:**

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its

#### Options

Converse

Contrapositive

Inverse

Alternative

###### Advertisements

#### Solution

**Contrapositive**

#### APPEARS IN

#### RELATED QUESTIONS

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p

**Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -**

“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”

Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "

Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :

(p ∨ q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)

Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`

Write the dual of the following statements:

Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.

If p : It is raining

q : It is humid

Write the following statements in symbolic form:

(a) It is raining or humid.

(b) If it is raining then it is humid.

(c) It is raining but not humid.

Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]

Show that the following statement pattern in contingency :

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)]

**Write the negation of the following statement : **If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.

**State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :**√-4 is a rational number.

**Write converse and inverse of the following statement :**

"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."

By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).

Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p

**Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.**

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r

Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]

Select and write the correct answer from the given alternative of the following question:

(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________ .

Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r

Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)

**Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r**

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r

**Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.**

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)

If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.

**Fill in the blanks :**

Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.

**Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.**

(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)

**Using the truth table, verify**

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)

**Using the truth table, verify**

~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p

**Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.**

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)

**Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.**

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q

**Write the dual of the following:**

(p ∨ q) ∨ r

**Write the dual of the following:**

~(p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p ∨ ~ q

**Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.**

Karina is very good or everybody likes her.

**Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.**

Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.

**Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:**

(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)

**Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.**

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"

**With proper justification, state the negation of the following.**

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~r)

**Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.**

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)

**Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.**

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]

**Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.**

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]

**Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.**

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r

**Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.**

p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q

**Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement. **

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.

**Write the dual of the following.**

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)

**Write the dual of the following.**

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q

The false statement in the following is ______.

Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.

“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”

**Write the dual of the following**

(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)

**Choose the correct alternative:**

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a

The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______

**Write the dual of the following.**

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country

**Examine whether the statement pattern**

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.

**Complete the truth table.**

p |
q |
r |
q → r |
r → p |
(q → r) ˅ (r → p) |

T | T | T | T | `square` | T |

T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |

T | F | T | T | `square` | T |

T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |

F | T | T | `square` | F | T |

F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |

F | F | T | `square` | F | T |

F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |

The given statement pattern is a `square`

If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively

The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to _______.

Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.

The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.

Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?

**Using truth table verify that:**

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q

**Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:**

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)

The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.

**Write the negation of the following statement:**

(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)

In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

- `bar(PR)`
- `bar(PM)`
- `bar(QM)`

Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.

If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].