Choose the correct alternative: If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements
MCQ

Choose the correct alternative:

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a

Options

  • Contingency

  • Contradiction

  • Tautology

  • None of these

Advertisements

Solution

Tautology

  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1.1: Mathematical Logic - Q.1

RELATED QUESTIONS

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p


Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”


Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "


Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T


Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


If   p : It is raining
     q : It is humid

Write the following statements in symbolic form:

(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid. 


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10


Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Select and write the correct answer from the given alternative of the following question:

(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________ .


Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)


Fill in the blanks :

Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Write the dual of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Write the negation of the following statement.

Some continuous functions are differentiable.


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.

Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.


The false statement in the following is ______.


Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.

“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”


Write the dual of the following

(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______


Write the dual of the following.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


Complete the truth table.

p q r q → r r → p (q → r) ˅ (r → p)
T T T T `square` T
T T F F `square` `square`
T F T T `square` T
T F F T `square` `square`
F T T `square` F T
F T F `square` T `square`
F F T `square` F T
F F F `square` T `square`

The given statement pattern is a `square`


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to _______.


Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)


The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.


Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:

(p→q)∧(p→r)


If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications



      Forgot password?
Use app×