AILET entrance exam Question Bank Solutions for Legal Reasoning

In India, cyber terrorism is an offence punishable under

__________ of the Constitution of India lays down that Union of India and the States are juristic person and can sue and be sued.

According to the Doctrine of ________, every generation is obliged to preserve its natural and cultural heritage for the enjoyment of future generations.

Which of the following is not recommended by the Justice Verma Committee?

The main objectives of the Judicial Standards Accountability Bill 2010 are

1. Is legislation which aims to increase accountability of the higher judiciary in India

2. It seeks to devise a new "complaint procedure" under which any person may be able to file a complaint in writing against any judge of a superior court

3. The issue of Judicial Standards must be seen in the context of Article 124(4) of the Constitution

4. The Bill seeks to provide a straight-jacketed definition of misbehavior in Clause 2 (k) Select the correct code:

On April 2013, the Supreme Court held that the modification of a well-known cancer-fighting drug is not a patentable new invention against which pharmaceutical firm?

In India, Uniform Civil Code is applicable in the State of:

How many duties are provided under Part-IV of the Constitution?

The Inter State Council has been constituted based on the recommendation of

Which of the following is not a constitutional body?

Legal principles:

1. Everyone has a right to defend their life and property against criminal harm provided it is not possible to approach public authorities and more harm than is necessary has been caused to avert the danger.
2 Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence.

Factual situation: The accused found the deceased engaged in sexual, intercourse with his 15-year-old daughter. The accused assaulted the deceased on the head with a spade which resulted in his death. Accused claimed private defence and the prosecution claimed that the sexual intercourse was with the consent of the daughter. Here, decision:

The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as ‘Assertion’ and the other as ‘Reason’. Read both the statements carefully and answer using the codes given below.

Assertion (A): The rule making power of the Supreme Court is not subject to any law made by the Parliament of India.

Reason (R): Only an impartial and independent judiciary can protect the rights of the individual without fear or favour.

Which of the following amendments are sought to be introduced in the Representation of the People Act through Amendment Bill, 2018?

I. Proxy voting
II. Gender-neutral provisions
III. Allocation of seats
IV. Delimitation of constituencies

The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Bill, 2019 seeks to amend _____ to include _____

Article 35 A, Constitution of India is regarding

Which of the following statements, are true regarding the jurisdiction of the High Court?

I. High Court can punish for its contempt.
II. High Court tender advice on the legal question referred to it by the Governor of the State.
III. High Court confirms the death sentences passed by lower judiciary.
IV. High Court can issue writs for enforcement of Fundamental rights.

Mark the best option:
Facts: Ram’s father and Rizvi were enemies. One day at the market Rizvi attacked Ram's father with a lathi. Ram’s father suffered a simple injury on his head. On seeing this Ram got hold of a gun and shot Rizvi in the head, in order to protect his father. The police arrested Ram and charged him with culpable homicide.
Principle:

1. The law recognizes an individual’s right to defend himself and his family and his property against any unlawful acts.
2. The person defending himself should not do more harm than is necessary, that is to say, that the force used to defend should be proportionate to the force used by the aggressor.

Consists of legal proposition(s)/  principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question.  
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability, even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of the law.  
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option. 

Principle: Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code provides that ‘When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.’

Facts: Three vagabonds, Sanju, Dilbag, and Sushil decided to commit burglary. In the night, Sushil opened the lock and they broke into a rich man’s house when the entire family was on a pilgrimage. Sanju had gone to that house earlier in connection with some cleaning job. Ther e was only a servant lady in the house. Hearing some sounds from the master bedroom, the servant switched on the lights and went up to the room from where she heard the sound. Noticing that the servant was going to cry for help, Sanju grabbed her and covered her mouth with his hands and dragged her into the nearby room. The other two were collecting whatever they could from the room. When they were ready to go out of the house, they looked for Sanju and found him committing rape on the servant. They all left the house and the servant reported the matter to the police and identified Sanju. Subsequently, all three were arrested in connection with the offences of housebreaking, burglary, and rape. Identify the legal liability of the three.

Mark the best option:
Principle:

1. Every person has a right to defend his own body, and the body of any other person, against any offence affecting the human body.
2. The right of private defence in no case extends to inflicting more harm than necessary for the purpose of defence.

Facts: Rajendra, a police inspector; saw two men on motorbikes; one armed with a stick and the other armed with a scythechasing a boy and warned them to stop harassing the boy however they continued pursuing the boy. Rajendra who was carrying a loaded revolver (and nothing else) shot the man carrying a stick on head thereby killing him instantly and the other carrying a scythe on his legs causing him to fall down. Decide Rajendra's liability based on the facts mentioned above.

Decide Rajendra's liability based on the facts mentioned above.

Mark the best option:
When a person is prosecuted for committing a criminal offense, the burden of proof is on __________?